Icicle Spear
Pokémon that run it
| Pokémon | Teams | Share of its teams | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
 Mamoswine | 69 | 7.25% | 46.92% |
 Baxcalibur | 41 | 7.74% | 38.15% |
 Weavile | 8 | 1.29% | 50.00% |
 Beartic | 3 | 7.14% | 22.73% |
 Froslass | 3 | 0.05% | 28.57% |
 Alolan Ninetales | 2 | 0.05% | 58.33% |
 Avalugg | 1 | 6.67% | 42.86% |
 Crabominable | 1 | 0.17% | 14.29% |
All-time figures across every format. Method
Icicle Spear FAQ
All-time, whole corpusIs Icicle Spear good in Pokémon Champions VGC?
Icicle Spear is ranked #304 of 453 moves by usage, carried by 128 teams (0.14% of teams). Those teams have won 46.99% of 1,307 games, below the 50% line. Usage says how many players trusted it; the win rate says how those games went.
Which Pokémon run Icicle Spear the most?
Mamoswine, Baxcalibur and Weavile are the top species carrying it, by teams. The win rate beside each one is that species' own record, not this move's.
| Name | Share of its teams | Win rate | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mamoswine | 7.25% | 46.92% | 812 |
| Baxcalibur | 7.74% | 38.15% | 325 |
| Weavile | 1.29% | 50.00% | 94 |
| Beartic | 7.14% | 22.73% | 22 |
| Froslass | 0.05% | 28.57% | 28 |
| Alolan Ninetales | 0.05% | 58.33% | 12 |
| Avalugg | 6.67% | 42.86% | 7 |
| Crabominable | 0.17% | 14.29% | 7 |
Is Icicle Spear spread across the metagame, or concentrated on a few Pokémon?
Concentrated: Mamoswine alone carries 53.91% of the 128 teams running Icicle Spear, and its top three species together account for 92.19%.
How reliable is Icicle Spear's win rate?
The 46.99% figure is a posterior mean, not a raw average; the interval behind it is 45.44%–48.54%, from 1,307 games. That is a wide band, which means the true rate could sit anywhere in it. Treat the point figure as a rough read, not a precise one.
Where do these numbers come from?
Tournament decklists and real match records for Pokémon Champions, ingested from Limitless, Victory Road and the official circuit. These figures are all-time over the whole corpus, not scoped to a format or window the way the boards above the search bar are. Win rates are shrunk toward the field average rather than printed raw, so a thin sample cannot top a board.