Power Whip
Pokémon that run it
| Pokémon | Teams | Share of its teams | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
 Tsareena | 664 | 43.60% | 49.15% |
 Gyarados | 128 | 10.77% | 48.23% |
 Gourgeist | 15 | 42.86% | 48.31% |
 Victreebel | 12 | 9.76% | 32.22% |
 Gliscor | 6 | 2.73% | 54.44% |
 Venusaur | 3 | 0.03% | 44.00% |
 Farigiraf | 1 | 0.01% | 52.63% |
 Grimmsnarl | 1 | 0.02% | 16.67% |
 Gyarados | 1 | 2.04% | 25.00% |
 Victreebel | 1 | 25.00% | 25.00% |
All-time figures across every format. Method
Power Whip FAQ
All-time, whole corpusIs Power Whip good in Pokémon Champions VGC?
Power Whip is ranked #183 of 453 moves by usage, carried by 828 teams (0.92% of teams). Those teams have won 48.87% of 8,915 games, below the 50% line. Usage says how many players trusted it; the win rate says how those games went.
Which Pokémon run Power Whip the most?
Tsareena, Gyarados and Gourgeist are the top species carrying it, by teams. The win rate beside each one is that species' own record, not this move's.
| Name | Share of its teams | Win rate | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tsareena | 43.60% | 49.15% | 7,170 |
| Gyarados | 10.77% | 48.23% | 1,437 |
| Gourgeist | 42.86% | 48.31% | 118 |
| Victreebel | 9.76% | 32.22% | 90 |
| Gliscor | 2.73% | 54.44% | 90 |
| Venusaur | 0.03% | 44.00% | 25 |
| Farigiraf | 0.01% | 52.63% | 19 |
| Grimmsnarl | 0.02% | 16.67% | 6 |
| Gyarados | 2.04% | 25.00% | 4 |
| Victreebel | 25.00% | 25.00% | 4 |
Is Power Whip spread across the metagame, or concentrated on a few Pokémon?
Concentrated: Tsareena alone carries 80.19% of the 828 teams running Power Whip, and its top three species together account for 97.46%.
How reliable is Power Whip's win rate?
The 48.87% figure is a posterior mean, not a raw average; the interval behind it is 48.06%–49.68%, from 8,915 games. That is a narrow band for a figure with this many games behind it.
Where do these numbers come from?
Tournament decklists and real match records for Pokémon Champions, ingested from Limitless, Victory Road and the official circuit. These figures are all-time over the whole corpus, not scoped to a format or window the way the boards above the search bar are. Win rates are shrunk toward the field average rather than printed raw, so a thin sample cannot top a board.