Normal Gem
Pokémon that run it
| Pokémon | Teams | Share of its teams | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 0.05% | 33.61% | |
| 1 | 0.39% | 14.29% | |
| 1 | 1.45% | 33.33% | |
| 1 | 0.03% | 14.29% | |
| 1 | 1.69% | 0.00% |
Usage is the share of teams carrying this item, not the share of Pokémon. The win rate is the posterior mean under a fitted prior, so a thinly played option is pulled toward the field average rather than reported at its raw rate. How these are measured. Every figure here is all-time over the whole corpus; the board this sits under follows the format and window pickers, so its numbers will differ.
Normal Gem FAQ
All-time, whole corpusIs Normal Gem good in Pokémon Champions VGC?
Normal Gem is ranked #156 of 161 items by usage, carried by 17 teams (0.02% of teams). Those teams have won 46.17% of 151 games, below the 50% line. Usage says how many players trusted it; the win rate says how those games went.
Which Pokémon run Normal Gem the most?
Sneasler, Conkeldurr and Diggersby are the top species carrying it, by teams. The win rate beside each one is that species' own record, not this item's.
| Name | Share of its teams | Win rate | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05% | 33.61% | 122 | |
| 0.39% | 14.29% | 7 | |
| 1.45% | 33.33% | 9 | |
| 0.03% | 14.29% | 7 | |
| 1.69% | 0.00% | 6 |
Is Normal Gem spread across the metagame, or concentrated on a few Pokémon?
Concentrated: Sneasler alone carries 76.47% of the 17 teams running Normal Gem, and its top three species together account for 88.24%.
How reliable is Normal Gem's win rate?
The 46.17% figure is a posterior mean, not a raw average; the interval behind it is 43.34%–49.00%, from 151 games. That is a wide band, which means the true rate could sit anywhere in it. Treat the point figure as a rough read, not a precise one.
Where do these numbers come from?
Tournament decklists and real match records for Pokémon Champions, ingested from Limitless, Victory Road and the official circuit. These figures are all-time over the whole corpus, not scoped to a format or window the way the boards above the search bar are. Win rates are shrunk toward the field average rather than printed raw, so a thin sample cannot top a board.