Frisk
Pokémon that run it
| Pokémon | Teams | Share of its teams | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
 Typhlosion-Hisui | 371 | 38.73% | 40.95% |
 Banette | 25 | 32.89% | 34.76% |
 Noivern | 19 | 10.50% | 32.33% |
 Gourgeist | 14 | 40.00% | 41.12% |
 Typhlosion | 5 | 5.81% | 15.38% |
 Grimmsnarl | 2 | 0.04% | 18.75% |
 Trevenant | 2 | 3.13% | 58.62% |
 Banette-Mega | 1 | 50.00% | 50.00% |
 Espathra | 1 | 0.20% | 58.82% |
All-time figures across every format. Method
Frisk FAQ
All-time, whole corpusIs Frisk good in Pokémon Champions VGC?
Frisk is ranked #90 of 189 abilitys by usage, carried by 439 teams (0.49% of teams). Those teams have won 42.49% of 3,748 games, below the 50% line. Usage says how many players trusted it; the win rate says how those games went.
Which Pokémon run Frisk the most?
Typhlosion-Hisui, Banette and Noivern are the top species carrying it, by teams. The win rate beside each one is that species' own record, not this ability's.
| Name | Share of its teams | Win rate | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typhlosion-Hisui | 38.73% | 40.95% | 3,233 |
| Banette | 32.89% | 34.76% | 187 |
| Noivern | 10.50% | 32.33% | 133 |
| Gourgeist | 40.00% | 41.12% | 107 |
| Typhlosion | 5.81% | 15.38% | 26 |
| Grimmsnarl | 0.04% | 18.75% | 16 |
| Trevenant | 3.13% | 58.62% | 29 |
| Banette-Mega | 50.00% | 50.00% | 6 |
| Espathra | 0.20% | 58.82% | 17 |
Is Frisk spread across the metagame, or concentrated on a few Pokémon?
Concentrated: Typhlosion-Hisui alone carries 84.51% of the 439 teams running Frisk, and its top three species together account for 94.53%.
How reliable is Frisk's win rate?
The 42.49% figure is a posterior mean, not a raw average; the interval behind it is 41.33%–43.65%, from 3,748 games. That is a wide band, which means the true rate could sit anywhere in it. Treat the point figure as a rough read, not a precise one.
Where do these numbers come from?
Tournament decklists and real match records for Pokémon Champions, ingested from Limitless, Victory Road and the official circuit. These figures are all-time over the whole corpus, not scoped to a format or window the way the boards above the search bar are. Win rates are shrunk toward the field average rather than printed raw, so a thin sample cannot top a board.