Psycho Cut
Pokémon that run it
| Pokémon | Teams | Share of its teams | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 865 | 88.09% | 45.72% | |
| 242 | 36.56% | 44.59% | |
| 98 | 26.70% | 39.37% | |
| 97 | 34.89% | 40.45% | |
| 55 | 37.16% | 47.66% | |
| 31 | 4.98% | 47.64% | |
| 25 | 38.46% | 38.69% | |
| 24 | 0.91% | 34.05% | |
| 22 | 1.14% | 39.90% | |
| 21 | 0.82% | 30.86% | |
| 8 | 61.54% | 34.21% | |
| 2 | 40.00% | 42.86% | |
| 1 | 9.09% | 40.00% |
All-time figures across every format. Method
Psycho Cut FAQ
All-time, whole corpusIs Psycho Cut good in Pokémon Champions VGC?
Psycho Cut is ranked #154 of 453 moves by usage, carried by 1,452 teams (1.61% of teams). Those teams have won 44.98% of 14,389 games, below the 50% line. Usage says how many players trusted it; the win rate says how those games went.
Which Pokémon run Psycho Cut the most?
Gallade, Starmie and Absol are the top species carrying it, by teams. The win rate beside each one is that species' own record, not this move's.
| Name | Share of its teams | Win rate | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| 88.09% | 45.72% | 8,600 | |
| 36.56% | 44.59% | 2,606 | |
| 26.70% | 39.37% | 856 | |
| 34.89% | 40.45% | 880 | |
| 37.16% | 47.66% | 577 | |
| 4.98% | 47.64% | 296 | |
| 38.46% | 38.69% | 137 | |
| 0.91% | 34.05% | 232 | |
| 1.14% | 39.90% | 203 | |
| 0.82% | 30.86% | 162 | |
| 61.54% | 34.21% | 38 | |
| 40.00% | 42.86% | 14 | |
| 9.09% | 40.00% | 5 |
Is Psycho Cut spread across the metagame, or concentrated on a few Pokémon?
Concentrated: Gallade alone carries 59.57% of the 1,452 teams running Psycho Cut, and its top three species together account for 82.99%.
How reliable is Psycho Cut's win rate?
The 44.98% figure is a posterior mean, not a raw average; the interval behind it is 44.33%–45.63%, from 14,389 games. That is a narrow band for a figure with this many games behind it.
Where do these numbers come from?
Tournament decklists and real match records for Pokémon Champions, ingested from Limitless, Victory Road and the official circuit. These figures are all-time over the whole corpus, not scoped to a format or window the way the boards above the search bar are. Win rates are shrunk toward the field average rather than printed raw, so a thin sample cannot top a board.