Mach Punch
Pokémon that run it
| Pokémon | Teams | Share of its teams | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 336 | 58.33% | 44.85% | |
| 185 | 71.15% | 47.06% | |
| 46 | 52.87% | 48.22% | |
| 38 | 4.67% | 49.28% | |
| 32 | 64.00% | 45.33% | |
| 15 | 10.56% | 44.32% | |
| 10 | 2.03% | 37.50% | |
| 4 | 5.71% | 51.72% | |
| 2 | 0.01% | 29.41% | |
| 1 | 1.19% | 41.67% | |
| 1 | 100.00% | 33.33% |
All-time figures across every format. Method
Mach Punch FAQ
All-time, whole corpusIs Mach Punch good in Pokémon Champions VGC?
Mach Punch is ranked #192 of 453 moves by usage, carried by 632 teams (0.70% of teams). Those teams have won 46.57% of 6,454 games, below the 50% line. Usage says how many players trusted it; the win rate says how those games went.
Which Pokémon run Mach Punch the most?
Crabominable, Conkeldurr and Grapploct are the top species carrying it, by teams. The win rate beside each one is that species' own record, not this move's.
| Name | Share of its teams | Win rate | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58.33% | 44.85% | 3,463 | |
| 71.15% | 47.06% | 1,923 | |
| 52.87% | 48.22% | 394 | |
| 4.67% | 49.28% | 414 | |
| 64.00% | 45.33% | 150 | |
| 10.56% | 44.32% | 176 | |
| 2.03% | 37.50% | 64 | |
| 5.71% | 51.72% | 29 | |
| 0.01% | 29.41% | 17 | |
| 1.19% | 41.67% | 12 | |
| 100.00% | 33.33% | 6 |
Is Mach Punch spread across the metagame, or concentrated on a few Pokémon?
Concentrated: Crabominable alone carries 53.16% of the 632 teams running Mach Punch, and its top three species together account for 89.72%.
How reliable is Mach Punch's win rate?
The 46.57% figure is a posterior mean, not a raw average; the interval behind it is 45.65%–47.49%, from 6,454 games. That is a narrow band for a figure with this many games behind it.
Where do these numbers come from?
Tournament decklists and real match records for Pokémon Champions, ingested from Limitless, Victory Road and the official circuit. These figures are all-time over the whole corpus, not scoped to a format or window the way the boards above the search bar are. Win rates are shrunk toward the field average rather than printed raw, so a thin sample cannot top a board.