Dragon Rush
Pokémon that run it
| Pokémon | Teams | Share of its teams | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | 0.29% | 42.48% | |
| 33 | 73.33% | 38.59% | |
| 17 | 0.28% | 27.48% | |
| 10 | 0.20% | 37.97% | |
| 7 | 0.03% | 37.70% | |
| 3 | 0.25% | 30.77% | |
| 2 | 0.56% | 0.00% | |
| 2 | 2.02% | 12.50% | |
| 2 | 0.07% | 11.11% | |
| 1 | 0.24% | 14.29% | |
| 1 | 0.19% | 0.00% | |
| 1 | 0.08% | 0.00% | |
| 1 | 0.18% | 0.00% |
All-time figures across every format. Method
Dragon Rush FAQ
All-time, whole corpusIs Dragon Rush good in Pokémon Champions VGC?
Dragon Rush is ranked #282 of 453 moves by usage, carried by 158 teams (0.18% of teams). Those teams have won 44.51% of 1,350 games, below the 50% line. Usage says how many players trusted it; the win rate says how those games went.
Which Pokémon run Dragon Rush the most?
Garchomp, Flapple and Dragonite are the top species carrying it, by teams. The win rate beside each one is that species' own record, not this move's.
| Name | Share of its teams | Win rate | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.29% | 42.48% | 751 | |
| 73.33% | 38.59% | 298 | |
| 0.28% | 27.48% | 131 | |
| 0.20% | 37.97% | 79 | |
| 0.03% | 37.70% | 61 | |
| 0.25% | 30.77% | 26 | |
| 0.56% | 0.00% | 5 | |
| 2.02% | 12.50% | 8 | |
| 0.07% | 11.11% | 9 | |
| 0.24% | 14.29% | 7 | |
| 0.19% | 0.00% | 5 | |
| 0.08% | 0.00% | 4 | |
| 0.18% | 0.00% | 7 |
Is Dragon Rush spread across the metagame, or concentrated on a few Pokémon?
Concentrated: Garchomp alone carries 54.43% of the 158 teams running Dragon Rush, and its top three species together account for 86.08%.
How reliable is Dragon Rush's win rate?
The 44.51% figure is a posterior mean, not a raw average; the interval behind it is 42.97%–46.05%, from 1,350 games. That is a wide band, which means the true rate could sit anywhere in it. Treat the point figure as a rough read, not a precise one.
Where do these numbers come from?
Tournament decklists and real match records for Pokémon Champions, ingested from Limitless, Victory Road and the official circuit. These figures are all-time over the whole corpus, not scoped to a format or window the way the boards above the search bar are. Win rates are shrunk toward the field average rather than printed raw, so a thin sample cannot top a board.