Technician
Pokémon that run it
| Pokémon | Teams | Share of its teams | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,488 | 96.96% | 50.18% | |
| 701 | 16.19% | 45.77% | |
| 181 | 96.79% | 54.12% | |
| 82 | 94.25% | 48.19% | |
| 17 | 10.63% | 46.15% | |
| 3 | 3.53% | 38.89% | |
| 2 | 5.71% | 11.11% | |
| 1 | 3.13% | 25.00% | |
| 1 | 50.00% | 63.64% | |
| 1 | 3.03% | 27.27% | |
| 1 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
All-time figures across every format. Method
Technician FAQ
All-time, whole corpusIs Technician good in Pokémon Champions VGC?
Technician is ranked #38 of 189 abilitys by usage, carried by 3,275 teams (3.63% of teams). Those teams have won 49.28% of 35,616 games, below the 50% line. Usage says how many players trusted it; the win rate says how those games went.
Which Pokémon run Technician the most?
Scizor, Maushold and Scizor are the top species carrying it, by teams. The win rate beside each one is that species' own record, not this ability's.
| Name | Share of its teams | Win rate | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| 96.96% | 50.18% | 28,059 | |
| 16.19% | 45.77% | 6,742 | |
| 96.79% | 54.12% | 1,190 | |
| 94.25% | 48.19% | 803 | |
| 10.63% | 46.15% | 91 | |
| 3.53% | 38.89% | 18 | |
| 5.71% | 11.11% | 9 | |
| 3.13% | 25.00% | 8 | |
| 50.00% | 63.64% | 11 | |
| 3.03% | 27.27% | 11 | |
| 0.00% | 0.00% | 5 |
Is Technician spread across the metagame, or concentrated on a few Pokémon?
Concentrated: Scizor alone carries 75.97% of the 3,275 teams running Technician, and its top three species together account for 102.90%.
How reliable is Technician's win rate?
The 49.28% figure is a posterior mean, not a raw average; the interval behind it is 48.85%–49.71%, from 35,616 games. That is a narrow band for a figure with this many games behind it.
Where do these numbers come from?
Tournament decklists and real match records for Pokémon Champions, ingested from Limitless, Victory Road and the official circuit. These figures are all-time over the whole corpus, not scoped to a format or window the way the boards above the search bar are. Win rates are shrunk toward the field average rather than printed raw, so a thin sample cannot top a board.