Sap Sipper

Ability · #126 of 189 by usage · 132 teams (0.15% of teams) · all abilitys

Games
1,258
Win rate
43.91%
42.25%–45.57%
Usage rank
#126 of 189

Pokémon that run it

PokémonTeamsShare of its teamsWin rate
Hisuian Goodra4919.14%42.20%
Goodra3245.71%33.46%
Farigiraf150.10%32.97%
Azumarill142.49%35.23%
Drampa111.62%45.87%
Wyrdeer86.78%24.24%
Gogoat457.14%44.44%
Potraman (Goodra-Hisui)2100.00%50.00%
Drampa12.63%60.00%

All-time figures across every format. Method

Sap Sipper FAQ

All-time, whole corpus
Is Sap Sipper good in Pokémon Champions VGC?

Sap Sipper is ranked #126 of 189 abilitys by usage, carried by 132 teams (0.15% of teams). Those teams have won 43.91% of 1,258 games, below the 50% line. Usage says how many players trusted it; the win rate says how those games went.

Which Pokémon run Sap Sipper the most?

Hisuian Goodra, Goodra and Farigiraf are the top species carrying it, by teams. The win rate beside each one is that species' own record, not this ability's.

NameShare of its teamsWin rateGames
Hisuian Goodra19.14%42.20%609
Goodra45.71%33.46%269
Farigiraf0.10%32.97%91
Azumarill2.49%35.23%88
Drampa1.62%45.87%109
Wyrdeer6.78%24.24%66
Gogoat57.14%44.44%36
Potraman (Goodra-Hisui)100.00%50.00%12
Drampa2.63%60.00%5
Is Sap Sipper spread across the metagame, or concentrated on a few Pokémon?

Spread: Hisuian Goodra alone carries 37.12% of the 132 teams running Sap Sipper, and its top three species together account for 72.73%.

How reliable is Sap Sipper's win rate?

The 43.91% figure is a posterior mean, not a raw average; the interval behind it is 42.25%–45.57%, from 1,258 games. That is a wide band, which means the true rate could sit anywhere in it. Treat the point figure as a rough read, not a precise one.

Where do these numbers come from?

Tournament decklists and real match records for Pokémon Champions, ingested from Limitless, Victory Road and the official circuit. These figures are all-time over the whole corpus, not scoped to a format or window the way the boards above the search bar are. Win rates are shrunk toward the field average rather than printed raw, so a thin sample cannot top a board.