Chlorophyll
Pokémon that run it
| Pokémon | Teams | Share of its teams | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8,587 | 94.83% | 50.61% | |
| 457 | 91.58% | 46.45% | |
| 358 | 12.08% | 47.26% | |
| 227 | 83.46% | 48.04% | |
| 120 | 97.56% | 40.40% | |
| 77 | 0.53% | 37.08% | |
| 67 | 98.53% | 38.18% | |
| 25 | 8.93% | 47.10% | |
| 3 | 75.00% | 33.33% | |
| 2 | 100.00% | 45.45% | |
| 1 | 0.02% | 41.67% | |
| 1 | 0.56% | 37.50% | |
| 1 | 100.00% | 25.00% |
All-time figures across every format. Method
Chlorophyll FAQ
All-time, whole corpusIs Chlorophyll good in Pokémon Champions VGC?
Chlorophyll is ranked #17 of 189 abilitys by usage, carried by 9,640 teams (10.69% of teams). Those teams have won 50.05% of 104,874 games, above the 50% line. Usage says how many players trusted it; the win rate says how those games went.
Which Pokémon run Chlorophyll the most?
Venusaur, Vileplume and Scovillain are the top species carrying it, by teams. The win rate beside each one is that species' own record, not this ability's.
| Name | Share of its teams | Win rate | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94.83% | 50.61% | 94,257 | |
| 91.58% | 46.45% | 4,506 | |
| 12.08% | 47.26% | 3,872 | |
| 83.46% | 48.04% | 1,403 | |
| 97.56% | 40.40% | 1,156 | |
| 0.53% | 37.08% | 623 | |
| 98.53% | 38.18% | 647 | |
| 8.93% | 47.10% | 138 | |
| 75.00% | 33.33% | 18 | |
| 100.00% | 45.45% | 11 | |
| 0.02% | 41.67% | 12 | |
| 0.56% | 37.50% | 8 | |
| 100.00% | 25.00% | 4 |
Is Chlorophyll spread across the metagame, or concentrated on a few Pokémon?
Concentrated: Venusaur alone carries 89.08% of the 9,640 teams running Chlorophyll, and its top three species together account for 97.53%.
How reliable is Chlorophyll's win rate?
The 50.05% figure is a posterior mean, not a raw average; the interval behind it is 49.80%–50.30%, from 104,874 games. That is a narrow band for a figure with this many games behind it.
Where do these numbers come from?
Tournament decklists and real match records for Pokémon Champions, ingested from Limitless, Victory Road and the official circuit. These figures are all-time over the whole corpus, not scoped to a format or window the way the boards above the search bar are. Win rates are shrunk toward the field average rather than printed raw, so a thin sample cannot top a board.